In a recent Akashic Record Insights workshop, we explored how cold cases can be understood through the Akashic Records. Discussion began with this question:
If you were looking at a cold case, a murder case from the past, would you ever get to the absolute truth of it if there is such a thing, or would it just be a matter of perspective?
The Akashic Records provide insight into past events, and truth depends on perspective and intention. Each soul and event carries multiple layers of meaning, shaped by dynamic, infinite experiences beyond linear time. By asking clear questions and considering context, we can weave together narratives, though absolute answers often remain elusive.
Summary Transcript:
Cheryl Marlene:
If you go looking for cold cases and working within the Akashic Records, it depends on the case and the question you’re trying to answer. There’s a difference between asking, “Who murdered this person?” versus “Who does this person think murdered them?” The context shapes the process significantly.
When examining cold cases or past events, you must be clear about the question you’re asking and the answer you seek. Depending on the context, you may not be able to get a clear view of the event, or even one that definitively shows what happened.
Interference can also play a role. In a murder case, for instance, the victim might have created energy at the time of their death that obscures clarity. Additional energy after the event might further cloud the view. To answer any question definitively, you need clarity in your questions and intentions.
If someone emotionally attached to a cold case asks you to investigate, their connection may make it easier to get closer to what happened. However, a case like identifying Jack the Ripper poses challenges. For someone like me, distant from the event, there’s little personal connection to whoever that was or what they did. The emotional and energetic proximity matters when seeking validation.
For deeply personal cases, like a parent’s murder, it’s often better to have someone else access the Records. Emotional attachment can cloud objectivity. Asking a neutral party allows the process to flow more freely, as everything from the Akashic Records comes through intention. The clearer the intention, the more likely you are to get an answer that resonates.
Does that answer your question?
Participant: So if your intention is to solve the murder to find an answer, you’ll get an answer, but it won’t necessarily be the complete answer.
Cheryl Marlene:
That’s true. That’s very possible. Or it can be the answer from a particular perspective. For example, if you’re trying to find out who shot someone in a crowd, each person in that crowd might have a slightly different perspective. That doesn’t necessarily mean you’ll pinpoint the shooter.
However, by working in the Records and gathering different perspectives, it becomes possible to piece them together. This approach allows you to identify the person, even if each account differs. It’s like assembling a puzzle where you ask, “How can all of this be true?” Forensic science works similarly, compiling evidence into a cohesive narrative.
Take the example of a murder. The trajectory of a bullet, for instance, must follow the laws of physics. If the bullet’s path is from the shoulder downward, the gun must have been higher up. These physical truths guide the interpretation of events, just as they do in the Records.
In many ways, investigating cold cases in the Records is like being Sherlock Holmes. If you eliminate the impossible, then whatever remains, however improbable, must be the truth. Yet, this process is challenging because the improbable often seems difficult to accept. Cold cases remain unsolved partly because they hinge on improbabilities that most people find hard to reconcile.
Using the Akashic Records involves exploring both possibilities and improbabilities. Through this process, you can weave together a narrative that most would find valid. The Records allow for a dynamic synthesis of perspectives, grounded in both the metaphysical and the physical.
Participant: So in the case of the Titanic, the guy who was supposed to spot the iceberg forgot his binoculars, and that’s why it sank.
Cheryl Marlene:
Yeah, it can come down to something that simple, which is often what people don’t want to hear. It might sound too straightforward to be probable. For example, whoever was supposed to be doing a task got sick from dinner, went to the bathroom, and boom—an event unfolded.
This illustrates one of the challenges of examining past events: we often view them through modern eyes. There are things that wouldn’t have been knowable or understood at the time. When using the Akashic Records, it’s essential to approach the past as it was experienced then, rather than projecting the present onto it.
As you delve further back in history, it becomes harder to engage with the Records or even conduct regular remote viewing. This is because our understanding is influenced by modern context. For instance, we’re accustomed to cell phones for communication. Go back 500 years, and such technology didn’t exist. Without a frame of reference, we may struggle to comprehend their methods of communication.
Interestingly, it’s said that six to ten thousand years ago, human communication—verbal speech—emerged. Before that, telepathy, or what we might call telepathy, was supposedly used. If you look back 15,000 years, human interaction would feel alien to us. This is the broader problem of history, anthropology, sociology, or any lens we use to understand the past. Our perspective is always colored by what we know today.
When we examine something beyond our historic reference, like trying to explain how the pyramids were built, we encounter the same issue. Our modern perspective creates challenges in fully understanding the past as it was.
Participant: Why is it that we can’t go to the Records and actually get, for example, the cold case, get the answer. And I know when we just talked about the perspectives, I understand everything that you just said, but the records know everything.
Cheryl Marlene:
Well, the Records are dynamic and they may contain everything, and to a certain extent, they may know everything, but their perspective is different than our perspective. And so it has to do with the fact that there’s almost never one answer to a question.
Participant: But if someone is murdered and a person killed them by shooting them, there’s only one person that shot the gun.
Cheryl Marlene:
That’s true, but it has a lot to do with perspective. If you open the Records of the killer, you gain a different view of the event than if you open the Records of the person who was killed. This, of course, assumes you have permission to do so, which isn’t usually the case.
To use the Records in such situations, you either need permission or must explore the event through alternative techniques. Essentially, this means looking at the event from a “fly on the wall” or third-person perspective. However, this doesn’t guarantee you’ll see exactly what happened. Sometimes it works; sometimes it doesn’t.
Even if you open the Records of the person who was killed, it doesn’t necessarily mean they know who killed them. When you access the Records of a deceased person, you’re accessing the Records of that soul in that specific body. This is distinct from opening the Records of the soul itself. The soul in that body may not hold the knowledge of who killed them.
Participant: The soul in that body, the one that crossed over may not know who killed the body? So there is no omniscience. Then once you cross over, you’re in a delusion of what killed you. I would say we have a review and we are like, that motherfucker killed me. Just saying,
Cheryl Marlene:
Well, here’s the thing. So what I’m getting out of the Records right now about that is not all souls care to know.
Participant: Okay. That’s fair.
Cheryl Marlene:
Yeah, we might think that’s how it always goes, but that’s not necessarily the case. It might be that the person wanted to be killed, so they don’t care who did it. They’re fine, they’ve moved on. In a murder, there’s what happens in real life and what happens to the souls involved. Once the soul leaves the body, the soul controls awareness. The reasons for a murder in real life can differ greatly from the experience of the soul.
For example, the soul might have decided, whether in the moment or eons ago, to give another soul the experience of killing someone. The reasoning, from the soul’s perspective, is far more intricate than what we might consider. When we approach it from the soul’s perspective, the possibilities multiply.
If we go into the Records to ask, “Who killed JFK?” there are ways to get answers and perspectives. But the process can reveal far more than you bargained for, adding layers of complexity and insight beyond the initial question.
Participant: So basically the Records are a collection, if I’m understanding this right, of the perspectives of the people involved and the event itself. But because reality is dynamic, there is no absolute truth.
Cheryl Marlene:
Yeah, that’s a good way to put it because the Records are essentially written in the moment. Using the book and library motif, the Records are created as you ask because they hold the infinite and eternal perspective. This means the response isn’t a single perspective but an interactive experience of the infinite and eternal within you. It provides what you need to hear in this moment to take your next step.
When using the Records for something like a cold case, the importance of asking clear questions becomes evident. Drawing out an answer is complex because you’re leaving real life now and stepping into real life back then. This is still connected infinitely, eternally, and as part of the whole.
The same applies when dealing with past lives. Theoretically, all that information exists, but our understanding of it is often linear. From a transcendent perspective, it’s not a linear chronology but the infinite and eternal experience of a soul. It encompasses more than the soul’s earthly experience—it’s the soul’s existence within infinity and eternity, unbound by linear time.
I picture the soul as the center of a sphere. Any question about past lives comes from 360 degrees, not one linear point. Each moment of experience creates another connected sphere, resulting in 360 degrees multiplied by infinity. Navigating all that energy to pinpoint an answer in linear time is a significant challenge.
It’s not impossible to get answers, even about the future. I’ve done that as well. However, validating the answers is often the issue. You can uncover who did what and feel the truth of it, but proving it to the world in a way they’d accept is another matter. Add conspiracy theories to the mix, and the complications grow.
This is why I’ve never written a book about who Jack the Ripper was. It’s nearly impossible to validate such answers to a broader audience. The Akashic Records challenge us to move beyond the idea of a book in a library with definitive answers. This concept of the Records being dynamic and infinite asks people to embrace what may sound improbable, even crazy, at first.
Participant:
The crazy becomes the Records sometimes.
Find more content like this on Cheryl’s YouTube Channel.
